PNHP Logo

| SITE MAP | ABOUT PNHP | CONTACT US | LINKS

NAVIGATION PNHP RESOURCES
Posted on August 23, 2007

Hudson's Chapin on health insurance

PRINT PAGE
EN ESPAÑOL

We All Need Healthcare; Who Needs “Insurance”?

By Georganne Chapin, JD, MPhil, President and CEO, Hudson Health Plan
Medscape General Medicine
July 27, 2007
Webcast Video Editorials

I am a health insurance and managed care executive so you may find this editorial a bit strange. I believe that the way to fix our healthcare system is to stop relying on insurance and focus instead on healthcare.

So, what’s wrong with health insurance?

Well, first, it’s temporary. This may work for auto policies, but not for human health.

Second, health insurance is mostly contingent on where you live and whom you work for. It’s easy to transfer car insurance, but not health insurance.

Finally, insurance companies make more money by minimizing pay-outs than by keeping people healthy. Human beings — who need preventive care, who have babies, who may lack living wages and job security, and who get older—find the house rules stacked against them.

Plans in Massachusetts, California, and soon New York propose to strew the same old red tape over even more people. Members of the same family could end up with separate policies, with different benefits and different expiration dates. This will make it even harder for doctors and hospitals to figure out whom to bill, which services are covered, and - worst of all - whether coverage will last long enough to complete treatment for a sick patient.

Other developed nations have universal healthcare, not “insurance.” They give healthcare to everybody, they spend less, and they are healthier for it.

But, we have an example of success in this country, too. It’s called Medicare. And while flawed, Medicare meets the most important criteria for a universal healthcare system: it’s permanent, it’s portable, and it’s simple and inexpensive to administer.

The health insurance model is flawed because it depends on people falling between the cracks after they pay their premiums and before they collect their “benefits.” Rather than insurance, providing healthcare to everyone would cost less and deliver more in the long run.

http://medgenmed.medscape.com/viewarticle/559758

Comment:

By Don McCanne, MD

Whether we call Medicare “insurance” or “healthcare” is not really important. What is important is that we need to stop relying on private insurance and adopt a public program that is “permanent, portable, and simple and inexpensive to administer.”